extensive big-picture editing
Developmental editing
My availability is more limited for developmental editing and I only take on a small number of these per year. If I am fully booked for these, or if you’d prefer a similar but less intensive service, you could consider a manuscript assessment.
Developmental editing provides you with:

what you get
Service includes…
You’ll receive an extensive editorial report (10–20 pages, depending on the length of your manuscript). This will focus on the major big-picture areas: plot, structure, characterisation, setting/world-building, your target market, and broader areas of writing craft such as exposition and point of view. Alongside this, I’ll provide marginal comments in every chapter, providing additional examples to complement the report, as well as questions to get you thinking more deeply about the story, and compliments on what I’m enjoying and what’s working well.
I’ll also send you a manuscript revision guide to help you implement any changes, and a customised resource sheet for further reading on the topics covered in my notes.
A one-hour consultation is included within two months of the edit – we can chat through any questions or ideas you have for revisions or you can pick my brain about writing and publishing. This will either be be an audio-only call or a live Google Chat.
I’ll look at a revision plan for your next draft (maximum 5,000 words) within two months of the edit, too – making sure you’re on track for any rewrites.
What’s the difference between developmental editing and a manuscript assessment?
I know this can be confusing – I’ve written an entire blog post to explain this.
Both of these services are forms of developmental editing. The key difference between developmental editing and a manuscript assessment is the intensity. They both focus on the big picture, but a developmental edit is more hands-on, since it also includes marginal comments in each chapter and, quite often, a consultation with the editor.
A manuscript assessment covers the same big-picture areas in the form of an editorial report. It’s a detailed, thorough evaluation, but leaves out the more intense aspects of a fuller dev edit, like the marginal comments. It’s ideal for authors who want a professional overview but worry about being overwhelmed by too much commentary.


